I guess you’ve been hearing about this bailout of Wall Street. You know, fat cat in a top hat. Thinks he’s an aristocrat. That’s crap.
Jim Morrison aside, crap is what they are talking about. Or junk as it is known on Wall Street.
In layman’s terms, the problem can be summed up as follows: Capitalism is a big shell game. One takes something of value from person A and sells it outright or transforms it and sells it to person B at a higher price, the difference is called profit.
Now we’ve evolved in our MBA wisdom away from widgets and tangible items of value to these complex paper-only items called bonds, or more MBA style “collateralized debt obligations.”
In essence, some guys sat around and figured the traditional loan and finance game was booked, kind of like the job market for a Gen-X’er waiting for a baby boomer to retire, so they created these CDOs by pooling assets and selling the debt to another financial house to raise capital to loan to third parties. At least that’s my understanding.
Because of the expansion of credit to everybody in America with our without the ability to pay, and because even more guys in finance needed a job, home loans got pushed to people who could not afford them and to others who never intended to pay them back. So you had the cornerstone of the American Dream becoming a tool in a high-stakes game of financial chance. Like Texas Hold’Em, you had bankers betting the value of the collateral (the home) would rise, and you had mechanics and wives of McDonald’s employees watching “Flip That House” thinking “I can get one of these zero-down loans, put in $2,000 in the bathroom sink and kitchen cabinets, and sell it to another schmuck for 5 percent more than my loan. Yeah, yeah, then I can buy that new handbag at Gucci and drive my Escalade to the beach house I rented for $4,500 for five nights.”
So in essence you had lots of people buying in to this idea that they could make a quick buck and then blow that money on consumerism that would go up in smoke in a flash of instant gratification.
The problem is that the immutable law of supply and demand reacts to a flood of supply by undercutting the price. When they all woke up, the value was diminished, and in some cases worthless because of the folks who never intended to put cash into the pipe in the first place.
So now we’ve got bankers and finance journalist running around like mad screaming “Bailout! Lo, the end is nigh! Bailout!”
I say no. I say let the bankers get a shovel and start mixing concrete and pushing wheelbarrows. They’d be more useful then.
While you’re at it, take all the jewel laden wenches I see on QVC and HSN pitching crap nobody really needs to buy. That’s half the problem. Consumerism now drives 65-70 percent of our country’s GDP. The implications of that are enormous and far too complex for me to get into here.
But when a guy in Eden loses his job making underwear to a guy in China because the Chinese can make it cheaper so we can buy it cheaper, something is really wrong. And when we have to have a government bailout of the finance industry to keep US consumer spending artificially propped up so the Chinese worker can keep that nation’s GDP growth above 10 percent by cranking out more and more crap to sell on QVC, we are, in a word, fucked.
Now there’s an a priori concept your can take to the bank.
Talking about it