I posted a comment on a youtube video that presents a completely one-sided picture of last week’s rallies at Hagan’s office in GSO.
I think the first comment said “Here is the other side of the coin” and linked to a roundup or story about the counterprotests.
I think the other comment may have just been a link to the articles.
The comments never appeared. A note from the video poster now appears explaining his “comment policy” for his youtube channel.
Do the above comments seem to fit his criteria for being removed or do you think this is a case of curtailment of free expression by the liberal activist?
I understand this activist is associated with the campaign of Joel Landau for Greensboro City Council.
Do they believe in censorship or free speech?
You let me know now, won’t ya’.
Filed under: North Carolina , censorship, joel landau, Kay Hagan
Dude, you are the extreme right wing blogger who incited the motorcycle obstruction and now you want to comment on the video.
Still upside down, I see.
Mr. Martin: I find it hard to believe that a blog that get’s less than 60 hits a day, 25 of which are to his review of Miracle at St. Anna, had any impact on the protest last week.
Additionally, the video poster’s references to me really blow my influence over anything way out of proportion.
I think its humorous actually that folks think I have that much power.
Was I responsible for what happened in Raleigh as well?
The videographer made the reference and no one else. Get some rhetoric skills.
I further posit that you knew the rider and put him up to it. One of your inbred Rockingham County cousions, no doubt.
Oops, I’ve besmirched your trophy. Better luck next time.
Mr. Martin: I’m from Winston-Salem and moved to this fine community in 2002.
I’ve often wondered why folks give you a pass for your racial and cultural insults that would get most folks labeled as a bigot.
What do you think explains that?
Have a pleasant week.